The grandparents at the font

The next joint up the Comte line asked whether Pierre Pascal’s parents, Pierre Lecomte and Geneviève Boulris at his 1758 baptism, were the couple married at Lachine in April 1751. The names matched, and names were all there was. P-0008’s file said the link would stay Probable-Strong « until a baptism of Pascal joins them ». That was the same mistake the morning made about Louis, and it is struck the same way: a baptism that names the parents is names again.

What did not work, and what did

The act that should have settled it, the court’s duplicate of the 1787 marriage with the father’s signature, is not on Généalogie Québec. Only the presbytère copy was filmed there. Steve ran the index instead: every marriage of a Geneviève Boutrice, Boullerice, Boulris or Boullerie, under any spelling we had seen. There was one, Lachine 1751 (S-0055). That rules out a second couple of the same names, within the index’s coverage.

Then Steve brought the PRDH family page (S-0056). PRDH’s demographers had linked, on their own, the 1751 couple to seventeen children, Pierre Pascal among them, with the same dates we had read from the acts. Compiled, so it cannot prove anything alone. But it did two things. It was a second reading that agreed with ours. And it showed where to look.

It also caught a misreading of ours. On 20 September the bride’s mother in the 1751 act was transcribed « Geneviève [Fotté? Setté?] ». PRDH and LAFRANCE both say Jetté. Re-cropped, the act reads jetté, its j descending as this hand’s j does elsewhere. S-0004 now says so, including that we read it that way only after being told what to look for.

The acts

The father’s signature appears in 1751, 1761 and 1764 in one form, in a spelling no priest used. The grandparents stand at the font. The children run without a break from Caughnawaga through Lachine to La Prairie. No act says grandfather, and none needed to.

The ruling

Steve ruled one couple. F-0003’s filiation of Pierre Pascal went from Probable-Strong to Proven, and with it the claims on Pierre and Geneviève that had waited on the question. Because the joint above Pierre was already Proven, the chain climbed two generations at once: Proven from Louis and Rose to Pierre Le Comte, the Montréal beadle, and Marie-Charlotte Fournier, married 1721 (positions 16 and 17). On the Boutrice side the joint is Proven, but the chain stops at Probable, because the 1731 marriage of Gabriel Boutrice and Geneviève Jetté is still an index entry, not an act.

Found and not used

Next

The 1731 Notre-Dame marriage of Gabriel Boutrice and Geneviève Jetté (F-0006), to lift the Boutrice chain from Probable. Then the other three lines. Each starts, as this one did, from a répertoire and a name.

All entries